Back
Date of survey | Instant survey / Follow-up survey | Very satisfied | Quite satisfied | Half-half | Not quite satisfied | Very dissatisfied | DK/HS | Total |
11-14/4/2005 | Follow-up survey | 2.0% | 28.4% | 30.7% | 18.6% | 5.6% | 14.7% | 100.0% |
16/3/2005 | Instant survey | 2.4% | 26.8% | 32.6% | 11.8% | 3.6% | 22.9% | 100.0% |
22-24/3/2004 | Follow-up survey | 0.4% | 17.2% | 33.3% | 29.0% | 12.1% | 8.0% | 100.0% |
10/3/2004 | Instant survey | 0.7% | 17.1% | 26.1% | 23.2% | 6.1% | 26.9% | 100.0% |
12-13/3/2003 | Follow-up survey | 0.4% | 8.4% | 15.7% | 37.6% | 22.1% | 15.9% | 100.0% |
5/3/2003 | Instant survey | 0.7% | 11.2% | 17.5% | 29.8% | 15.6% | 25.3% | 100.0% |
18-20/3/2002 | Follow-up survey | 1.0% | 26.8% | 29.2% | 19.5% | 3.3% | 20.2% | 100.0% |
6/3/2002 | Instant survey | 0.7% | 25.6% | 21.2% | 17.2% | 4.2% | 31.0% | 100.0% |
30-31/3/2001 | Follow-up survey | 1.6% | 34.4% | 31.2% | 18.0% | 4.4% | 10.4% | 100.0% |
7-8/3/2001 | Instant survey | 1.7% | 43.7% | 22.8% | 11.6% | 2.2% | 17.9% | 100.0% |
20/3/2000 | Follow-up survey | 1.6% | 45.1% | 24.4% | 8.9% | 2.2% | 15.8% | 100.0% |
8/3/2000 | Instant survey | 5.3% | 54.7% | 16.4% | 7.4% | 1.2% | 15.0% | 100.0% |
24/2/1998 | Follow-up survey | 1.6% | 40.8% | 24.2% | 14.1% | 1.4% | 17.9% | 100.0% |
18/2/1998 | Instant survey | 3.4% | 38.4% | 20.6% | 11.6% | 1.1% | 24.9% | 100.0% |
Collapsed data
Date of survey | Instant survey / Follow-up survey | Satisfied | Half-half | Dissatisfied | DK/HS | Total |
11-14/4/2005 | Follow-up survey | 30.4% | 30.7% | 24.2% | 14.7% | 100.0% |
16/3/2005 | Instant survey | 29.2% | 32.6% | 15.3% | 22.9% | 100.0% |
22-24/3/2004 | Follow-up surveyy | 17.5% | 33.3% | 41.2% | 8.0% | 100.0% |
10/3/2004 | Instant survey | 17.8% | 26.1% | 29.3% | 26.9% | 100.0% |
12-13/3/2003 | Follow-up surveyy | 8.7% | 15.7% | 59.7% | 15.9% | 100.0% |
5/3/2003 | Instant survey | 11.9% | 17.5% | 45.3% | 25.3% | 100.0% |
18-20/3/2002 | Follow-up surveyy | 27.7% | 29.2% | 22.8% | 20.2% | 100.0% |
6/3/2002 | Instant survey | 26.4% | 21.2% | 21.4% | 31.0% | 100.0% |
30-31/3/2001 | Follow-up surveyy | 36.0% | 31.2% | 22.4% | 10.4% | 100.0% |
7-8/3/2001 | Instant survey | 45.4% | 22.8% | 13.9% | 17.9% | 100.0% |
20/3/2000 | Follow-up survey | 46.7% | 26.4% | 11.0% | 15.8% | 100.0% |
8/3/2000 | Instant survey | 59.9% | 16.4% | 8.7% | 15.0% | 100.0% |
24/2/1998 | Follow-up survey | 42.4% | 24.2% | 15.5% | 17.9% | 100.0% |
18/2/1998 | Instant survey | 41.8% | 20.6% | 12.7% | 24.9% | 100.0% |
Date of survey | Instant survey / Follow-up survey | Sub-sample base | Very satisfied | Quite satisfied | Half-half | Not quite satisfied | Very dissatisfied | DK/HS | Total |
11-14/4/2005 | Follow-up survey | 829* | 2.3% | 37.7% | 34.9% | 15.2% | 2.6% | 7.4% | 100.0% |
16/3/2005 | Instant survey | 544* | 5.2% | 42.3% | 29.0% | 9.4% | 1.9% | 12.3% | 100.0% |
22-24/3/2004 | Follow-up survey | 884* | 0.9% | 31.2% | 45.9% | 14.9% | 2.9% | 4.2% | 100.0% |
10/3/2004 | Instant survey | 395* | 2.1% | 35.0% | 33.2% | 10.4% | 1.3% | 18.0% | 100.0% |
12-13/3/2003 | Follow-up survey | 920* | 1.1% | 11.9% | 16.2% | 40.3% | 24.8% | 5.6% | 100.0% |
5/3/2003 | Instant survey | 495* | 1.4% | 18.5% | 23.2% | 35.1% | 14.5% | 7.3% | 100.0% |
18-20/3/2002 | Follow-up survey | 1019* | 2.4% | 41.8% | 30.8% | 16.4% | 2.4% | 6.2% | 100.0% |
6/3/2002 | Instant survey | 539* | 3.4% | 43.8% | 22.9% | 13.8% | 3.6% | 12.6% | 100.0% |
30-31/3/2001 | Follow-up survey | 424* | 1.9% | 37.7% | 29.9% | 17.3% | 4.0% | 9.2% | 100.0% |
7-8/3/2001 | Instant survey | 263* | 3.4% | 53.6% | 24.7% | 11.9% | 1.0% | 5.5% | 100.0% |
20/3/2000 | Follow-up survey | 615* | 3.1% | 60.7% | 18.1% | 4.4% | 1.6% | 12.1% | 100.0% |
8/3/2000 | Instant survey | 643* | 7.9% | 62.4% | 11.8% | 3.4% | 0.6% | 13.8% | 100.0% |
18/3/1999 | Follow-up survey | 511* | 2.9% | 54.1% | 21.0% | 10.2% | 1.0% | 10.8% | 100.0% |
3/3/1999 | Instant survey | 598* | 2.0% | 43.8% | 27.1% | 8.5% | 1.5% | 17.1% | 100.0% |
24/2/1998 | Follow-up survey | 522* | 2.7% | 57.2% | 20.1% | 8.6% | 0.9% | 10.4% | 100.0% |
18/2/1998 | Instant survey | 638* | 4.2% | 50.5% | 19.5% | 6.9% | 0.5% | 18.3% | 100.0% |
Collapsed data
Date of survey | Instant survey / Follow-up survey | Sub-sample base | Satisfied | Half-half | Dissatisfied | DK/HS | Total |
11-14/4/2005 | Follow-up survey | 829* | 39.9% | 34.9% | 17.8% | 7.4% | 100.0% |
16/3/2005 | Instant survey | 544* | 47.5% | 29.0% | 11.3% | 12.3% | 100.0% |
22-24/3/2004 | Follow-up survey | 884* | 32.1% | 45.9% | 17.8% | 4.2% | 100.0% |
10/3/2004 | Instant survey | 395* | 37.1% | 33.2% | 11.7% | 18.0% | 100.0% |
12-13/3/2003 | Follow-up survey | 920* | 13.0% | 16.2% | 65.1% | 5.6% | 100.0% |
5/3/2003 | Instant survey | 495* | 19.9% | 23.2% | 49.6% | 7.3% | 100.0% |
18-20/3/2002 | Follow-up survey | 1019* | 44.2% | 30.8% | 18.9% | 6.2% | 100.0% |
6/3/2002 | Instant survey | 539* | 47.2% | 22.9% | 17.4% | 12.6% | 100.0% |
30-31/3/2001 | Follow-up survey | 424* | 39.6% | 29.9% | 21.3% | 9.2% | 100.0% |
7-8/3/2001 | Instant survey | 263* | 57.0% | 24.7% | 12.8% | 5.5% | 100.0% |
20/3/2000 | Follow-up survey | 615* | 63.8% | 18.1% | 5.0% | 12.1% | 100.0% |
8/3/2000 | Instant survey | 643* | 70.3% | 11.8% | 4.0% | 13.8% | 100.0% |
18/3/1999 | Follow-up survey | 511* | 57.0% | 21.0% | 11.2% | 10.8% | 100.0% |
3/3/1999 | Instant survey | 598* | 45.8% | 27.1% | 10.0% | 17.1% | 100.0% |
24/2/1998 | Follow-up survey | 522* | 59.9% | 20.1% | 9.5% | 10.4% | 100.0% |
18/2/1998 | Instant survey | 638* | 54.7% | 19.5% | 7.4% | 18.3% | 100.0% |
Excluding those who had not heard of the Budget
The Financial Secretary said he would uphold the principle of "Market Leads, Government Facilitates". Do you agree to this idea? |
Date of Survey | Instant survey / Follow-up survey | Agree | Disagree | DK/HS | Total |
11-14/4/2005 | Follow-up survey | 62.4% | 10.5% | 27.2% | 100.0% |
16/3/2005 | Instant survey | 70.6% | 8.0% | 21.4% | 100.0% |
The Financial Secretary made several tax relief proposals, which include abolishing estate duty, introducing allowances for taxpayers taking care of dependent parents or grandparents aged between 55 and 59, as well as increasing the child allowance from $30,000 per child to $40,000. Do you think these tax relief measures are adequate? |
Date of Survey | Instant survey / Follow-up survey | Adequate | Not adequate | DK/HS | Total |
11-14/4/2005 | Follow-up survey | 40.7% | 45.5% | 13.8% | 100.0% |
16/3/2005 | Instant survey | 53.3% | 36.1% | 10.6% | 100.0% |
The Financial Secretary proposed that there would be no adjustment in the duty on alcoholic beverages and rates charge, as well as no introduction of new tax items at this stage. Do you agree to these measures? |
Date of Survey | Instant survey / Follow-up survey | Agree | Disagree | DK/HS | Total |
11-14/4/2005 | Follow-up survey | 67.5% | 19.5% | 13.0% | 100.0% |
16/3/2005 | Instant survey | 70.6% | 18.0% | 11.4% | 100.0% |
Overall speaking, do you think the tax system in Hong Kong is fair or unfair? |
Date of Survey | Instant survey / Follow-up survey | Very fair | Quite fair | Quite unfair | Very unfair | DK/HS | Total |
11-14/4/2005 | Follow-up survey | 9.4% | 47.6% | 20.4% | 9.8% | 12.9% | 100.0% |
16/3/2005 | Instant survey | 10.2% | 49.2% | 19.3% | 7.6% | 13.7% | 100.0% |
22-24/3/2004 | Follow-up survey | 5.3% | 52.5% | 19.9% | 10.7% | 11.5% | 100.0% |
10/3/2004 | Instant survey | 6.9% | 50.9% | 21.0% | 9.8% | 11.3% | 100.0% |
12-13/3/2003 | Follow-up survey | 4.9% | 44.7% | 21.3% | 15.5% | 13.6% | 100.0% |
5/3/2003 | Instant survey | 6.1% | 44.5% | 19.4% | 14.0% | 16.0% | 100.0% |
18-20/3/2002 | Follow-up survey | 7.1% | 56.0% | 17.4% | 7.4% | 12.1% | 100.0% |
6/3/2002 | Instant survey | 6.3% | 48.7% | 20.8% | 7.9% | 16.3% | 100.0% |
Collapsed data
Date of Survey | Instant survey / Follow-up survey | Fair | Unfair | DK/HS | Total |
11-14/4/2005 | Follow-up survey | 57.0% | 30.2% | 12.9% | 100.0% |
16/3/2005 | Instant survey | 59.4% | 26.9% | 13.7% | 100.0% |
22-24/3/2004 | Follow-up survey | 57.8% | 30.7% | 11.5% | 100.0% |
10/3/2004 | Instant survey | 57.8% | 30.8% | 11.3% | 100.0% |
12-13/3/2003 | Follow-up survey | 49.6% | 36.8% | 13.6% | 100.0% |
5/3/2003 | Instant survey | 50.6% | 33.4% | 16.0% | 100.0% |
18-20/3/2002 | Follow-up survey | 63.1% | 24.8% | 12.1% | 100.0% |
6/3/2002 | Instant survey | 55.0% | 28.7% | 16.3% | 100.0% |
Then, do you think the distribution of wealth in Hong Kong is reasonable or unreasonable? |
Date of Survey | Instant survey / Follow-up survey | Very reasonable | Quite reasonable | Quite unreasonable | Very unreasonable | DK/HS | Total |
11-14/4/2005 | Follow-up survey | 3.4% | 25.8% | 24.8% | 26.0% | 20.0% | 100.0% |
16/3/2005 | Instant survey | 3.3% | 25.3% | 27.6% | 22.9% | 20.9% | 100.0% |
22-24/3/2004 | Follow-up survey | 1.6% | 21.0% | 30.5% | 31.5% | 15.4% | 100.0% |
10/3/2004 | Instant survey | 2.3% | 19.2% | 31.2% | 31.0% | 16.3% | 100.0% |
12-13/3/2003 | Follow-up survey | 1.3% | 17.8% | 26.6% | 38.3% | 16.0% | 100.0% |
5/3/2003 | Instant survey | 1.5% | 17.1% | 28.1% | 32.0% | 21.3% | 100.0% |
18-20/3/2002 | Follow-up survey | 1.7% | 24.4% | 32.5% | 20.2% | 21.3% | 100.0% |
6/3/2002 | Instant survey | 1.4% | 23.9% | 28.5% | 23.3% | 22.9% | 100.0% |
Collapsed data
Date of Survey | Instant survey / Follow-up survey | Reasonable | Unreasonable | DK/HS | Total |
11-14/4/2005 | Follow-up survey | 29.2% | 50.8% | 20.0% | 100.0% |
16/3/2005 | Instant survey | 28.6% | 50.5% | 20.9% | 100.0% |
22-24/3/2004 | Follow-up survey | 22.6% | 62.0% | 15.4% | 100.0% |
10/3/2004 | Instant survey | 21.5% | 62.2% | 16.3% | 100.0% |
12-13/3/2003 | Follow-up survey | 19.1% | 64.9% | 16.0% | 100.0% |
5/3/2003 | Instant survey | 18.6% | 60.1% | 21.3% | 100.0% |
18-20/3/2002 | Follow-up survey | 26.1% | 52.7% | 21.3% | 100.0% |
6/3/2002 | Instant survey | 25.3% | 51.8% | 22.9% | 100.0% |