Back
Date of survey | Very satisfied | Quite satisfied | Half-half | Not quite satisfied | Very dissatisfied | DK/HS | Total |
10/3/2004 | 0.7% | 17.1% | 26.1% | 23.2% | 6.1% | 26.9% | 100.0% |
5/3/2003 | 0.7% | 11.2% | 17.5% | 29.8% | 15.6% | 25.3% | 100.0% |
6/3/2002 | 0.7% | 25.6% | 21.2% | 17.2% | 4.2% | 31.0% | 100.0% |
7-8/3/2001 | 1.7% | 43.7% | 22.8% | 11.6% | 2.2% | 17.9% | 100.0% |
8/3/2000 | 5.3% | 54.7% | 16.4% | 7.4% | 1.2% | 15.0% | 100.0% |
18/2/1998 | 3.4% | 38.4% | 20.6% | 11.6% | 1.1% | 24.9% | 100.0% |
Collapsed data
Date of survey | Satisfied | Half-half | Dissatisfied | DK/HS | Total |
10/3/2004 | 17.8% | 26.1% | 29.3% | 26.9% | 100.0% |
5/3/2003 | 11.9% | 17.5% | 45.3% | 25.3% | 100.0% |
6/3/2002 | 26.4% | 21.2% | 21.4% | 31.0% | 100.0% |
7-8/3/2001 | 45.4% | 22.8% | 13.9% | 17.9% | 100.0% |
8/3/2000 | 59.9% | 16.4% | 8.7% | 15.0% | 100.0% |
18/2/1998 | 41.8% | 20.6% | 12.7% | 24.9% | 100.0% |
Date of survey | Sub-sample base | Very satisfied | Quite satisfied | Half-half | Not quite satisfied | Very dissatisfied | DK/HS | Total |
10/3/2004 | 395* | 2.1% | 35.0% | 33.2% | 10.4% | 1.3% | 18.0% | 100.0% |
5/3/2003 | 495* | 1.4% | 18.5% | 23.2% | 35.1% | 14.5% | 7.3% | 100.0% |
6/3/2002 | 539* | 3.4% | 43.8% | 22.9% | 13.8% | 3.6% | 12.6% | 100.0% |
7-8/3/2001 | 263* | 3.4% | 53.6% | 24.7% | 11.9% | 1.0% | 5.5% | 100.0% |
8/3/2000 | 643* | 7.9% | 62.4% | 11.8% | 3.4% | 0.6% | 13.8% | 100.0% |
3/3/1999 | 598* | 2.0% | 43.8% | 27.1% | 8.5% | 1.5% | 17.1% | 100.0% |
18/2/1998 | 638* | 4.2% | 50.5% | 19.5% | 6.9% | 0.5% | 18.3% | 100.0% |
Collapsed data
Date of survey | Sub-sample base | Satisfied | Half-half | Dissatisfied | DK/HS | Total |
10/3/2004 | 395* | 37.1% | 33.2% | 11.7% | 18.0% | 100.0% |
5/3/2003 | 495* | 19.9% | 23.2% | 49.6% | 7.3% | 100.0% |
6/3/2002 | 539* | 47.2% | 22.9% | 17.4% | 12.6% | 100.0% |
7-8/3/2001 | 263* | 57.0% | 24.7% | 12.8% | 5.5% | 100.0% |
8/3/2000 | 643* | 70.3% | 11.8% | 4.0% | 13.8% | 100.0% |
3/3/1999 | 598* | 45.8% | 27.1% | 10.0% | 17.1% | 100.0% |
18/2/1998 | 638* | 54.7% | 19.5% | 7.4% | 18.3% | 100.0% |
Excluding those who had not heard of the Budget
The Financial Secretary said that the economic outlook for 2004 was rather bullish, and a steady growth was envisaged for the subsequent four years. Do you agree with what he said? |
Date of Survey | Agree | Disagree | DK/HS | Total |
10/3/2004 | 46.9% | 34.6% | 18.5% | 100.0% |
The Financial Secretary said that his target was to achieve consolidated and operating balances by 2008/09, meaning that the target set by the former Financial Secretary would be deferred by two years. Do you think the government can achieve this? (2004) |
Date of Survey | Yes | No | DK/HS | Total |
10/3/2004 | 38.5% | 36.0% | 25.5% | 100.0% |
5/3/2003 | 16.8% | 62.3% | 20.9% | 100.0% |
6/3/2002 | 30.7% | 38.4% | 30.9% | 100.0% |
The Financial Secretary said that he proposed no further increases in salaries tax, profits tax or any other taxes, and there would be no tax reductions or rates adjustments either. Do you agree to these measures? |
Date of Survey | Agree | Disagree | DK/HS | Total |
10/3/2004 | 78.5% | 14.1% | 7.4% | 100.0% |
The Financial Secretary proposed the Government to issue bonds at value not exceeding $20 billions in 2004-05, in order to raise funds and invest in capital projects. Do you agree to this proposal? |
Date of Survey | Agree | Disagree | DK/HS | Total |
10/3/2004 | 66.4% | 14.4% | 19.2% | 100.0% |
The Financial Secretary said his principle was "market leads and government facilitates". Do you agree to this principle? |
Date of Survey | Agree | Disagree | DK/HS | Total |
10/3/2004 | 60.3% | 15.4% | 24.3% | 100.0% |
Overall speaking, do you think the tax system in Hong Kong is fair or unfair? |
Date of Survey | Very fair | Quite fair | Quite unfair | Very unfair | DK/HS | Total |
10/3/2004 | 6.9% | 50.9% | 21.0% | 9.8% | 11.3% | 100.0% |
5/3/2003 | 6.1% | 44.5% | 19.4% | 14.0% | 16.0% | 100.0% |
6/3/2002 | 6.3% | 48.7% | 20.8% | 7.9% | 16.3% | 100.0% |
Collapsed data
Date of Survey | Fair | Unfair | DK/HS | Total |
10/3/2004 | 57.8% | 30.8% | 11.3% | 100.0% |
5/3/2003 | 50.6% | 33.4% | 16.0% | 100.0% |
6/3/2002 | 55.0% | 28.7% | 16.3% | 100.0% |
Then, do you think the distribution of wealth in Hong Kong is reasonable or unreasonable? |
Date of Survey | Very reasonable | Quite reasonable | Quite unreasonable | Very unreasonable | DK/HS | Total |
10/3/2004 | 2.3% | 19.2% | 31.2% | 31.0% | 16.3% | 100.0% |
5/3/2003 | 1.5% | 17.1% | 28.1% | 32.0% | 21.3% | 100.0% |
6/3/2002 | 1.4% | 23.9% | 28.5% | 23.3% | 22.9% | 100.0% |
Collapsed data
Date of Survey | Reasonable | Unreasonable | DK/HS | Total |
10/3/2004 | 21.5% | 62.2% | 16.3% | 100.0% |
5/3/2003 | 18.6% | 60.1% | 21.3% | 100.0% |
6/3/2002 | 25.3% | 51.8% | 22.9% | 100.0% |